Showing posts with label focus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label focus. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Your Meeting of the Year

When are you going to have your best meeting of the year?   Next week?  Next month? 4th Quarter?

I may have already had mine the day before yesterday.  I set out in 2013 with the goal of more coffee and lunch meetings with more creative people to network, brainstorm, and gain ideas from to help kickstart the year.  And my meeting with Nicholas McGill, an acquaintance I've not seen for several years, ended up providing me with more value and inspiration than I ever imagined.

We have the potential to help each other with connections, business opportunities, and personal goal achievement--and it made me wonder why I let several years go by without reaching out to him.  We have our next meeting already on the calendar to follow up on the areas where we might be able to help one another.

In case you're wondering, this extremely bright talented young man runs his own company here in Northern California, Heroik Media, and has a team working with him transforming businesses, people, and heck--who knows, maybe the world next.  Watch Nicholas' two-minute video introduction--you won't be disappointed and it might inspire you to:

  • Consider how you tell the world who you are
  • Consider who you are in the first place
  • Consider reaching out to Nicholas via email
  • Consider that next coffee or lunch meeting you schedule.

When will be your best meeting of the year?

Monday, December 17, 2012

What Thing Are You Going To Do Today?

Karla Nelson, Principal at Swiss Avenue Partners and founder of SBEIA (Small Business Economic Impact Alliance) sent me a follow-up note after a recent meeting, and on the back of the note was one of the most high-impact quotes I've ever read by Paulo Coelho.  Cuelho is a popular writer most noted for The Alchemist.

"One day you'll wake up and there won't be any more time to do the things you've always wanted.  Do it now."      -Paulo Cuelho-

What thing are you going to do today?


Monday, December 10, 2012

Do You Have a "Dream Team?"

It's sometimes called a network, personal board of advisers, or mastermind group.  But I like this definition from Patti Johnson taken from the Success Magazine Blog site:  The Six People You Need on Your Dream Team.

  1. The Pro
  2. The Encourager
  3. The Innovator
  4. The Challenger
  5. The Connector
Ooops, where's the 6th?

I'ts you.  But for most of us, we try everything as a solo-act.  Read the article and find the five people who will help you get where you want to go.


Thursday, December 6, 2012

Right People, Opportunity, and Compensation

"If you pick the right people and give them the opportunity to spread their wings—and put compensation as a carrier behind it—you almost don't have to manage them."               --Jack Welch--


I'd add that this means giving your people the tools and target, getting out of their way, and clearly showing the rewards for winning.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Select Your Crew, Get Rid of Mutineers, and Harness Everyone's Strengths

It is so tempting.

You arrive as a new supervisor or manager in a department or division.  And the first thing you want to do is to "change things" and make your mark and make a difference.

You learn the business, you go see some customers, you design some new programs and "ways of doing things," and within 30-90 days, you LAUNCH your new plan.

And in 90 more days, you haven't reached your goals and the results are not that much different.

Why?  Because you started with tactics, programs, and measures.  You didn't start with the people.

Jim Collins said it better than anyone in Good to Great.  First, you:

  1. Get the right people on the bus
  2. Get the wrong people off the bus
  3. And get the right people in the right seats
But assessing, working with, and adding or eliminating people take up valuable time, right?  Yup, sure does.  "I'll figure out the people part later, but for now--I've got to change somethings and satisfy my boss!"

In extreme cases, you have to step aboard and make immediate changes.  Like the ship's First Mate who takes over for a Captain wounded in battle.  If he doesn't put out the fires, plug the leaks, and grab the wheel with both hands--the entire ship and crew are in trouble.

But unless your ship is on fire and leaking water, you need to first CAREFULLY select your crew, and in particular--the leaders of that crew.  You need to remove the mutineers and leave them on shore.  And then you need to see to it that everyone on the ship is doing the job they were born to do--which might not necessarily be the job they're in now.

When the crew is right, only then can you chart your course, raise the sail, and head North with the confidence that you are all a team committed to one thing: the destination.




Tuesday, September 4, 2012

On Purpose

Mission and values….yes.  But purpose?  What is a company's "purpose statement?"

Verne Harnish (author of Mastering the Rockefeller Habits) puts it this way.  "Values are the rules of the organization.  Purpose is the heart."

Questions to get at your purpose:

"Why are we doing what we are doing?"

"What is the reason we are in the business we are in?"

"What is our Passion for the business we're in?"

"What's our Higher Reason for being in this specific business?"


When you've developed your purpose statement, it breathes life into why you're here. And whether you're a company of 10,000 or a company of 1, it is always better to be "on purpose."

Friday, November 18, 2011

"No." One Of The Most Powerful Words Ever.

This recent post by Seth Godin should remind us all that its okay to say "no."  In fact, saying no may be the best decision you ever make.

From Seth:

No.

No, we don't take clients like that.

No, that's not part of what we offer.

No, that market is too hard for us to service properly.

No, I won't bend on this principle.

No, I'm sorry, I won't be able to have lunch with you.

No, that's not good enough. Will you please do it again?

No, I'm not willing to lose my focus, and no, I'm not willing to compromise.

Seth's Blog

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Sage Advice From Drucker

I try to keep up with reading my copy of "The Daily Drucker" which is a compilation of Peter Drucker's work arranged by topic with an idea provided for each day of the year. I share here a particularly insightful essay based on Drucker's work "The Effective Executive."

Five points:

1. Know where your time goes.
2. Focus on outward contributions.
3. Build on strengths.
4. Concentrate on superior performance.
5. Make effective decisions.


From "The Daily Drucker"

Five practices have to be acquired to be effective. Effective executives know where their time goes.  They work systematically at managing the little of their time that can be brought under their control.  Effective executives focus on outward contributions.  Effective executives build on strengths--theirs and others. They do not build on weaknesses.  Effective executives concentrate on superior performance where superior performance will produce outstanding results.  They force themselves to stay within priorities.  Effective executives make effective decisions.  They know that this is a system--the right steps in the right sequence.  They know that to make decisions fast is to make the wrong decisions. Whenever I have found a person who--no matter how great in intelligence, industry, imagination, or knowledge--fails to observe these practices, I have also found an executive deficient in effectiveness.  Peter F. Drucker

Hard to argue...

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Survival Tips for Wholesalers (Shelter Magazine Interview)

I thought I'd re-share the thoughts and ideas below--hoping they'll resonate with wholesalers seeking ways to increase the value they offer their customers--and their manufacturers.

Survival Tips
Former General Manager Gives Tips on How to Stay Successful
by Samantha Carpenter, editor of Shelter magazine.

(Originally published in Shelter Magazine, March 2008)


Distribution need not sell around its customers, but rather provide a tier of services at a cost—and as a helpful function—to satisfy end-user needs together with its customers,” says Jeff Wedge, a veteran of the building products distribution climate. An innovative idea like this one is what Wedge believes he and others in the distribution industry need to adopt in order to survive the changing distribution business, and offers “out-of-the-box” concepts from one of the industry’s most innovative thinkers.

Special Delivery

As an example, Wedge says that a wholesale distributor could offer jobsite delivery. “A wholesale distributor could, in fact, develop jobsite delivery services that would not replace the retailer or dealer’s services, but be a service for the retailer or dealer,” Wedge says. “An example of that is a truckload of windows. Instead of delivering them to the lumberyard, I could deliver them to the jobsite for a nominal fee charged to the lumberyard. The [lumberyard] would, in turn, not have to pay for [its] employee, [its] fuel, or [its] truck and tie [it] up from servicing another customer. [The lumberyard] could pay me to do that. And, due to my scale and logistics expertise, I could probably handle those windows and deliver them in better condition than a lot of lumberyards or retailers could anyhow.” The distributor is providing a service so the retailer doesn’t have to, he says.

“I could go a step further now that I’ve got them [the materials] at the jobsite. I could stock the project; I could put all my doors near each opening they are assigned to; and I could stage all the windows next to the openings,” Wedge says. He says that his former company, Hampton Distribution in Sacramento, Calif., had this type of vision of jobsite service. Hampton wanted to develop an installation program with its own installers who would (for a fee) offer installation for the lumberyard or pro-dealer or the non-technically install-oriented dealer who doesn’t have the infrastructure, the insurance or the team to do that, so the distributor, in turn, could represent their products as installed to the end users and to the consumer. “I believe that the distributor can help reach through and down to the end user—not to threaten [the dealer or retailer] but help them to do more,” Wedge says.

Another idea Wedge has includes a fit-and-finish program (or sometimes referred to as a lock-and-slide program). “I’m talking specifically about the door business and window business,” Wedge explains. “When the windows have been installed and construction is continuing, there is an opportunity for the distributor to go to the jobsite and walk through and check and adjust all the windows, maybe even install all the hardware, clean the tracks and do troubleshooting. You are doing two things: saving a lot of money for that jobsite call down the road … and while on the jobsite, looking for the opportunity for additional business.”

And another idea for distributors is the adjustment, replacement and repair after a job is complete. Wedge says that while many manufacturers, distributors and retailers have taken this role, “I think distributors have a chance to go in and assert themselves. There is a strong value for providing that service for the whole marketplace, proactively, not reactively.”

Fear Factor

Wedge says there are many reasons why distributors are afraid to face the problems within their industry. First is the perceived threat that, if they offer services like jobsite delivery, they are going to threaten their customers. “They might think my ultimate goal is to cut them out and do it myself. And that’s a very, very fine line to walk,” Wedge admits. “If I do, quite frankly, develop the ability to deliver to the jobsite and to install the windows, and I know who all the architects, builders and remodelers are in a given area—then many keen retailers and pro-dealers would possibly believe that is the next step [to take over their business].”

Wedge says that distributors would need to make it very clear to their customers that this is not the case. “The enormous scale of the points of transaction, the credit, and the sheer logistics is not something they would want to take on in an entire marketplace and sell direct to end users, but collaborating with [the retailer and dealer] is.” Starting an installation program from scratch would be difficult, according to Wedge. “[At our company], we knew we would have to purchase an organization that already had installers and that [it] might sell more products than we handled, such as cabinets, doors and windows,” Wedge says. “But to get that expertise, we would have to buy a company that was already doing it, that had a line of insurance and expertise to scale.”

Wedge says then the two companies could be blended. “And that’s a formidable task. That’s not what distribution has done in the past; it’s vastly different,” he says. “So that crosses into the third reason [why distributors are afraid to change]: these ideas are foreign to what distribution has always been.”

But what will happen if distributors and their dealers stay in their traditional roles? Wedge says both companies could lose market share. “Many pro-dealers and retailers don’t do these same things for fear of losing customers. For instance, a major lumberyard owner may choose not to offer installed product initiative because he thinks, ‘If I install, well that’s what my contractors do. I’ll take their business; I can’t do that,’” Wedge explains. “That’s not how to look at it. A lot of these builders would love to have a back-up installation leg on which to stand.” Wedge says this is a possible scenario: a contractor may be running thin with people, he may get backed up, he may ask a lumberyard with an installation program to help install a job and “it may be the greatest savior the contractor could ever imagine.” Wedge suggests that the contractor might say, “Hey, I’m really glad you were there for me. Hey, that worked pretty well. I might try that again next time.” If distributors don’t start looking at new services to offer their customers, what does Wedge believe will happen?

“[Distributors] will wait and watch product lines, one at a time, go direct,” he says.

Wedge believes there are a number of reasons that manufacturers want to exert control over the supply chain by going direct. “They want to ensure that their product[s] [are] sold first and in the best light and sales are seen through to the end,” Wedge says. “In many situations, a distributor handles competitive lines, but the fact of the matter is: the manufacturer has to have absolute confidence that all of the sales department’s promotional efforts and advertising dollars and all of the field sales, training and sales calls done result in a sale of [its] product. When [it is] in control of all those aspects … [it has] a field sales force that is totally committed to selling [its] product and nothing else, and that’s a very attractive component.”

Sit at the Table

One way to ensure that distributors and suppliers have the same goals in mind is to sit down and discuss them. It doesn’t sound hard, but Wedge believes there aren’t many companies actually doing this. Andersen Windows, according to Wedge, coined the phrase for their work with distributorships—a joint business plan. “And we used that with a lot of our dealings with our suppliers [at Hampton]. We would sit down at the beginning of the year (and preferably four times a year total) to talk about our products purchased versus the plan we had mutually developed, promotional elements, services offered, target customers, promotional publications, offers and so forth. [We talked about] the actions that we both needed to commit to as a manufacturer and a supplier in order to grow share,” he explains. Wedge has spent the last eight months communicating to the distribution industry ways in which he believes it needs to change (through his website www.thewedgeedge.com and industry blogs, such as Adam J. Fein’s Distribution Trends blog).

Wedge’s distributorship closed May 2, 2007, when Andersen Windows made the decision to distribute its products itself rather than through distributorships in the western market. “It was just going to be a matter of time for Andersen to extend its logistics model to all areas of the West. It made sense. We understood it, but we didn’t like it,” Wedge says. “Andersen was extremely fair in the way it helped us and treated us upon our exit. Andersen’s decision to finally take the territory over with company-owned distribution was the final straw for us. It didn’t make it feasible for us to remain in business. Andersen was 80 percent of our volume.”

Wedge says that a lot of people have asked him, “How in the world did you ever let Andersen become 80 percent of your business?” “When my boss and I came to the company, it wasn’t,” Wedge says. “We had four separate divisions and multiple products, and we were not focused and weren’t executing well. We decided we didn’t want to be a company that was ‘everything to everyone’ and we decided to ask ourselves, ‘If you are going to be in this business, what are you best at, what do you have passion for and what can you make money at?’ … We decided we were great at Andersen and we were really good at doors.” So the company sold off all its other divisions and put themselves in that position intentionally.

“Because of it, we ended up winning the exclusive agreement and distribution in the West for Andersen,” Wedge says. “That was a great win, but as Andersen’s Pacific Northwest and Southern California expansions occurred, it left Sacramento as this little island by itself, and over time, it was just too attractive for Andersen to sow up [its] entire model. It made sense.” “There are never any hard feelings,” Wedge says. His company is now closed.

Wedge will need to put into action many of his ideas, if he wants his next distribution industry venture to be a success. Other professionals will need to institute innovative ideas to survive the changing distribution business as well.

Call to Attention

If you attended the Association of Millwork Distributors’ (AMD) Convention in Denver in October 2007 you’ll remember Don Houghton, AMD’s immediate past president, reading Wedge’s letter of resignation from the Board of Directors (see the November/December 2007 issue of Shelter, page 20); Wedge resigned from the board because his company closed.

In the letter, Wedge wrote, “I encourage the leadership in this industry to build on the ideas and momentum that have recently sprung forth, and change the heading we are on—and forever increase the benefits and vitality to our customers, our suppliers and ourselves. And to do so this year … My greatest disappointment would be if these outstanding initial steps and beliefs failed to find enough voices and actions to help propel the industry in a bold new direction and prove the critics wrong.”

The association took Wedge’s advice and made some dramatic changes to its bylaws. For instance, the AMD membership passed a bylaw that allows for associate members to serve in a board of director position and as an officer on the executive committee.

The Inventory Pitfall

Jeff Wedge, former general manager of Hampton Distribution, which closed its doors in May of 2007, says that distributors need to become solution and logistics providers, not inventory managers. “Taking orders, the inventory, the transactional element and delivery is not the entire game any longer,” Wedge says.
“Distribution needs to reach down into the channel and provide services that can be of greater value, not only to the retailer, but to the end-user. When I satisfy those two audiences, I’ll do a better job satisfying the manufacturer.”
Wedge says distributors have three masters that they need to satisfy: the customer, the end-user, and the supplier. “Distributors need to, of course, take care of their customers. Distributors need to take care of their customers’ customers and help them be better, and they need to, of course, make sure that their suppliers could not imagine the sale of their products into a given marketplace through any other means.”

Feedback Wanted

If you would like to discuss some of Jeff Wedge’s ideas in this article or other ideas he has, please e-mail him at jeffwedge@sbcglobal.net or visit his website at www.thewedgeedge.com.
Shelter

© Copyright 2008 Key Communications Inc. All rights reserved. No reproduction of any type without expressed written permission.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

What Gets Measured Gets Attention....


....and what gets attention gets results.  There's truth in this concept that "what gets measured gets attention--and what gets attention gets results."

It is difficult to deny that the goal of every organization must include “results.”  To go through the actions of business, transactions, product development, program initiatives, and tactical execution WITHOUT the attainment of results is in itself disappointing, but is totally unacceptable if the “results” were never the focus, not measured, not spoken about, unclear, and were not at the heart of the leader and his or her team’s focus and conversations.

How do you do this?  One way to start is to ask yourself “how visual is my workplace?”  If for instance, safety, on-time shipments, customer satisfaction, or profit margins are important--how do you keep track of those?  Better yet--how does your team and how do your employees keep track of those?

A visual workplace is one where the company metrics aren't a secret, where they're not shared only among the management team.

A visual workplace is one where the "vital signs" are posted, they are shared, and they are used in daily decision-making.  A visual workplace uses "dashboards" or charts or bulletin boards to post the progress against the stated goals and objectives.

And while you're considering sharing vital information--why not post your entire strategic plan?  Whether you post it for all employees or in your office for you and your team to review frequently--Verne Harnish has created some outstanding tools for business planning.  Review and download his templates and planning forms at http://www.gazelles.com/.

One of the Gazelle's primary principles is to create measurements and themes and post them for all to see--and to track the progress throughout the year.

Three keys to creating a visual workspace are:

1. Select a small number of metrics to measure that reveal the progress of the company and departments towards the top objectives.

2. Use dashboards and easy-to-read graphs or charts to convey the "green light/red light" status toward the goals.

3.  Keep them updated.

And finally, engage your team and employees in conversations regularly around the progress you're making.  Bring attention to the measurements--and you'll bring attention to the results.

Monday, November 1, 2010

What's Your Company Culture?

Innovative? Risk averse? Customer centric? Entrepreneurial?

There's a culture within your company.  Your people reflect it--and the leader at the top sets it.  Are you WHO you want your customers to experience?  Why or why not? 

If the answer to your question isn't what you think is right--ask your customers.  They'll tell you.  But deep inside--you really know, don't you? 

Most great companies are really clear about this--and at the end of the day--their customers are (1) at the top of the org charts, (2) in the center of everyone's efforts and focus, and (3) why the company exists.

Are you there?  Is your customer?

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Execute...or be Ex-e-cu-ted

There is no doubt that one of the top five lessons I have learned in business is that of execution. And in fact at times it might be number one.

Having worked for a company in the first half of this decade that was fairly good at execution—I have learned how to spot execution when it exists, and more importantly—when it doesn’t. The CEO of our parent company felt execution was so paramount to successful business that he developed The Execution Award for managers who demonstrated effective focus, clarity of management, and clear speed in getting things done. Unfortunately, he would tell you that he could count on one hand the number of times he gave the award away across the various business that were part of the organization. My company was able to secure the award once. And we thought we were good at it.

Yes, execution is elusive.

When it exists, people explain things simply to one another, they reach clear agreements, and they hold one another accountable for results. You can observe it in those who are successful in gaining clear commitments from others, those who write down steps and dates and ensure everyone knows what they are, and then follows up to see to it what was promised truly gets done.

You can also see when execution is lacking—such as in these examples:

A president asks his team at a meeting when something will be completed, and the answer from one of the vice-presidents is “a couple of weeks.” The president then says, “Good—as long as it’s not going to be six weeks.” No one writes anything down and the conversation moves on.

(The problem here is that the president accepted a vague answer, did not write down a precise commitment date, and let the conversation move on without coming to a clear agreement on who, what, and when)

Or two, a manager sends an email to three recipients and addresses remarks to no one in particular—saying she needs some certain result by sometime next week.

(Here again, the lack of specifics cause each of the three recipients to think “Hmmm, certainly one of the other two will respond to this—since it wasn’t directed at me personally” and so it goes. Each of three recipients all go on thinking ‘someone else’ will handle it—and almost certainly no one will)

Or three, the supervisor of a work group needs to know that a brand new process has been used in 100% of the week’s production schedule to meet a quality guarantee. The ideal question would be something like “Was this new process used from the start of Shift ‘A’ this week—and continuously in every shift since right up through today?” Instead, the supervisor who isn’t practicing a solid discipline of execution attempts to ask the question—but expresses it instead as a statement: “And, the new process has been used from the start of Shift ‘A’ this week? His trailing tone leaves it hanging there as a confusing combination between a weak question and an even weaker statement. Its easy for the employees to silently nod their head, but the real answer is never flushed out.

Execution simply means getting things done. And as you can see, it has a very clear connection with a person’s ability to communicate clearly and with intention. You must use direct language. You must look people in the eye when you ask them questions—and get clear agreement. Assumptions cannot be made. Dates and promises are to be written down. Follow-up is to be consistent. And rewards afforded to those who execute—and withheld with those that do not.

Once you begin understanding and recognizing when good execution is present—and when it is not—you will be more purposeful in your dealings with people, with your communication, with your follow up, and with your attention to results.

It is, after all, what separates those who do—from those who do not.